Contact – +1-276-477-5910
 Email – [email protected]

Home >>

the United States Outlook 2023

>>

The - Outlook for Medical Waste Management for US Zip Codes

The 2023-2028 Outlook for Medical Waste Management for US Zip Codes
Report code: SDMRTH1682814 | Industry: the United States Outlook 2023 | Published On: 1/9/2023
 Sample & Brochure   Talk to Analyst   Request Customization  Make an enquiry   Discount

This study covers the latent demand outlook for medical waste management across the states and zip codes of the United States. Latent demand (in millions of U.S. dollars), or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) estimates are given across some 10,833 zip codes in the United States. For each zip code in question, the percent share the zip code is of its state and of the United States as a whole is reported. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a zip code vis-à-vis others. This statistical approach can prove very useful to distribution and/or sales force strategies. Using econometric models which project fundamental economic dynamics within each state and zip code, latent demand estimates are created for medical waste management. This report does not discuss the specific players in the market serving the latent demand, nor specific details at the product level. The study also does not consider short-term cyclicalities that might affect realized sales. The study, therefore, is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved.

In this report we define the sales of medical waste management as including all commonly understood products and/or services falling within this broad category, irrespective of product packaging, formulation, size, or form. Companies participating in this industry include All Medical Waste Australia Pty, Ltd., AT&T Intellectual Property., Bertin Technologies - Laboratory Equipment, Biomedical Waste Services, Biopro, Bio-safety Incineration, Ltd., Bondtech, BWS, Inc., Casella Waste Systems, Clean Harbors, Converge Medical Solutions, LLC, Daniels Health USA, Dutch Medical Waste Systems B.V., EcoMed, EPCO, Gamma Waste Services, GIC Medical Disposal, GRP & Associates, Inc., Hawaii Bio-Waste Systems, Inc., LifeSpan Technology Recycling, LLC, Mazaya Waste Management, LLC, Medasend Biomedical, Inc., Medpro Disposal, MedWaste Management, Newster srl - Medical waste sterilizers, OZONATOR Industries, Ltd., P. Henkel GmbH, Pacific Medical Specialties, LLC, PHS Wastemanagement, Remondis Medison, Republic Services, San-I-Pak Pacific, Sharp Compliance, Inc., Stericycle, STI BioSAFE, SUEZ, the Mark-Costello Company, Trinova Medical Waste Solutions, LLC, Triumvirate Environmental, United Medical Waste Management, US Ecology, Veolia, and Waste By Rail, Inc.. In addition to the sources indicated, additional information available to the public via news and/or press releases published by players in the industry was considered in defining and calibrating this category. All figures are in a common currency (U.S. dollars, millions) and are not adjusted for inflation (i.e., they are current values). Exchange rates used to convert to U.S. dollars are averages for the year in question. Future exchange rates are assumed to be constant in the future at the current level (the average of the year of this publication's release in 2022).

1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 OVERVIEW
1.2 WHAT  IS  LATENT  DEMAND  AND  THE  P.I.E.?
1.3 THE  METHODOLOGY
1.3.1 STEP  1.  PRODUCT  DEFINITION  AND  DATA  COLLECTION
1.3.2 STEP  2.  FILTERING  AND  SMOOTHING
1.3.3 STEP  3.  FILLING  IN  MISSING  VALUES
1.3.4 STEP  4.  VARYING  PARAMETER,  NON-LINEAR  ESTIMATION
1.3.5 STEP  5.  FIXED-PARAMETER  LINEAR  ESTIMATION
1.3.6 STEP  6.  AGGREGATION  AND  BENCHMARKING
1.4 FREQUENTLY  ASKED  QUESTIONS  (FAQ)
1.4.1 CATEGORY  DEFINITION
1.4.2 UNITS
1.4.3 METHODOLOGY
2 SUMMARY  OF  FINDINGS
2.1 LATENT  DEMAND  IN  THE  UNITED  STATES
2.2 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  IN  THE  UNITED  STATES
2.3 TOP  100  CITIES  IN  THE  UNITED  STATES
3 FAR  WEST
3.1 EXECUTIVE  SUMMARY
3.2 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  ALASKA
3.3 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  ALASKA
3.4 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  CALIFORNIA
3.5 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  CALIFORNIA
3.6 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  HAWAII
3.7 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  HAWAII
3.8 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  NEVADA
3.9 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  NEVADA
3.10 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  OREGON
3.11 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  OREGON
3.12 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  WASHINGTON
3.13 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  WASHINGTON
4 GREAT  LAKES
4.1 EXECUTIVE  SUMMARY
4.2 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  ILLINOIS
4.3 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  ILLINOIS
4.4 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  INDIANA
4.5 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  INDIANA
4.6 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  MICHIGAN
4.7 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  MICHIGAN
4.8 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  OHIO
4.9 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  OHIO
4.10 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  WISCONSIN
4.11 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  WISCONSIN
5 MID-ATLANTIC
5.1 EXECUTIVE  SUMMARY
5.2 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  DELAWARE
5.3 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  DELAWARE
5.4 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  DISTRICT  OF  COLUMBIA
5.5 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  DISTRICT  OF  COLUMBIA
5.6 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  MARYLAND
5.7 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  MARYLAND
5.8 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  NEW  JERSEY
5.9 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  NEW  JERSEY
5.10 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  NEW  YORK
5.11 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  NEW  YORK
5.12 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  PENNSYLVANIA
5.13 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  PENNSYLVANIA
6 NEW  ENGLAND
6.1 EXECUTIVE  SUMMARY
6.2 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  CONNECTICUT
6.3 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  CONNECTICUT
6.4 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  MAINE
6.5 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  MAINE
6.6 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  MASSACHUSETTS
6.7 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  MASSACHUSETTS
6.8 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  NEW  HAMPSHIRE
6.9 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  NEW  HAMPSHIRE
6.10 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  RHODE  ISLAND
6.11 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  RHODE  ISLAND
6.12 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  VERMONT
6.13 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  VERMONT
7 PLAINS
7.1 EXECUTIVE  SUMMARY
7.2 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  IOWA
7.3 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  IOWA
7.4 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  KANSAS
7.5 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  KANSAS
7.6 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  MINNESOTA
7.7 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  MINNESOTA
7.8 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  MISSOURI
7.9 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  MISSOURI
7.10 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  NEBRASKA
7.11 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  NEBRASKA
7.12 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  NORTH  DAKOTA
7.13 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  NORTH  DAKOTA
7.14 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  SOUTH  DAKOTA
7.15 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  SOUTH  DAKOTA
8 ROCKIES
8.1 EXECUTIVE  SUMMARY
8.2 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  COLORADO
8.3 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  COLORADO
8.4 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  IDAHO
8.5 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  IDAHO
8.6 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  MONTANA
8.7 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  MONTANA
8.8 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  UTAH
8.9 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  UTAH
8.10 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  WYOMING
8.11 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  WYOMING
9 SOUTHEAST
9.1 EXECUTIVE  SUMMARY
9.2 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  ALABAMA
9.3 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  ALABAMA
9.4 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  ARKANSAS
9.5 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  ARKANSAS
9.6 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  FLORIDA
9.7 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  FLORIDA
9.8 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  GEORGIA
9.9 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  GEORGIA
9.10 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  KENTUCKY
9.11 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  KENTUCKY
9.12 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  LOUISIANA
9.13 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  LOUISIANA
9.14 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  MISSISSIPPI
9.15 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  MISSISSIPPI
9.16 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  NORTH  CAROLINA
9.17 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  NORTH  CAROLINA
9.18 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  SOUTH  CAROLINA
9.19 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  SOUTH  CAROLINA
9.20 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  TENNESSEE
9.21 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  TENNESSEE
9.22 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  VIRGINIA
9.23 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  VIRGINIA
9.24 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  WEST  VIRGINIA
9.25 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  WEST  VIRGINIA
10 SOUTHWEST
10.1 EXECUTIVE  SUMMARY
10.2 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  ARIZONA
10.3 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  ARIZONA
10.4 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  NEW  MEXICO
10.5 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  NEW  MEXICO
10.6 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  OKLAHOMA
10.7 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  OKLAHOMA
10.8 LATENT  DEMAND  BY  YEAR  -  TEXAS
10.9 CITIES  SORTED  BY  ZIPCODE  -  TEXAS
11 DISCLAIMERS,  WARRANTIES,  AND  USER  AGREEMENT  PROVISIONS
11.1 DISCLAIMERS  &  SAFE  HARBOR
11.2 ICON  GROUP  INTERNATIONAL,  INC.  USER  AGREEMENT  PROVISIONS
For more info contact [email protected]
 Feel free to contact us

 
Choose License Type
Select User Type


Report code


Buy Now

x

Use Code

SDMR20

Purchase any report

AVAIL FLAT DISCOUNT